In discussing data structures, it is important to understand the difference between a data structure's interface and its implementation. An interface describes what a data structure does, while an implementation describes how the data structure does it.
An interface, sometimes also called an abstract data type, defines the set of operations supported by a data structure and the semantics, or meaning, of those operations. An interface tells us nothing about how the data structure implements these operations, it only provides the list of supported operations along with specifications about what types of arguments each operation accepts and the value returned by each operation.
A data structure implementation on the other hand, includes the
internal representation of the data structure as well as the definitions
of the algorithms that implement the operations supported by the data
structure. Thus, there can be many implementations of a single interface.
For example, in Chapter 2, we will see implementations of the
interface using arrays and in Chapter 3 we will
see implementations of the
interface using pointer-based data
structures. Each implements the same interface,
,
but in different ways.
The
interface represents a collection of elements to which we
can add elements and remove the next element. More precisely, the operations
supported by the
interface are
A FIFO (first-in-first-out)
, illustrated in Figure 1.1,
removes items in the same order they were added, much in the same
way a queue (or line-up) works when checking out at a cash register
in a grocery store. This is the most common kind of
so the
qualifier FIFO is often ommitted. In other texts, the
and
operations on a FIFO
are often called
and
, respectively.
A priority
, illustrated in Figure 1.2, always
removes the smallest element from the
, breaking ties arbitrarily.
This is similar to the way patients are triaged in a hospital emergency
room. As patients arrive they are evaluated and then placed in a waiting
room. When a doctor becomes available they first treat the patient with
the most life-threatening condition. The
operation on a
priority
is usually called
in other texts.
A very common queueing discipline is the LIFO (last-in-first-out)
discipline, illustrated in Figure 1.3. In a LIFO Queue,
the most recently added element is the next one removed. This is best
visualized in terms of a stack of plates; plates are placed on the top of
the stack and also removed from the top of the stack. This structure is
so common that it gets its own name:
. Often, when discussing a
, the names of
and
are changed to
and
; this is to avoid confusing the LIFO and FIFO queueing
disciplines.
A
is a generalization of both the FIFO
and LIFO
(
). A
represents a sequence of elements, with a front
and a back. Elements can be added at the front of the sequence or
the back of the sequence. The names of the operations on a
are self-explanatory:
,
,
,
and
. Notice that a
can be implemented using only
and
while a FIFO
can be implemented
using only
and
.
This book will talk very little about the FIFO
,
, or
interfaces. This is because these interfaces are subsumed by the
interface. A
, illustrated in Figure 1.4, represents a
sequence,
, of values. The
interface
includes the following operations:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Although we will normally not discuss the
,
and FIFO
interfaces in subsequent chapters, the terms
and
are sometimes used in the names of data structures that implement the
interface. When this happens, it is to highlight the fact that
these data structures can be used to implement the
or
interface very efficiently. For example, the
class is an
implementation of the
interface that implements all the
operations in constant time per operation.
The
interface represents an unordered set of unique elements,
mimicking a mathematical set. A
contains
distinct
elements; no element appears more than once; the elements are in no
specific order. A
supports the following operations:
These definitions are a bit fussy about distinguishing
, the element
we are removing or finding, from
, the element we remove or find.
This is because
and
might actually be distinct objects that
are nevertheless treated as equal.
This is a very useful distinction since it allows for the creation of
dictionaries or maps that map keys onto values. This is
done by creating a compound object called a
that contains a
key and a value. Two
s are treated as equal if their
keys are equal. By storing
s in a
, we can find the value
associated with any key
by creating a
,
, with key
and using the
method.
The
interface represents a sorted set of elements. An
stores elements from some total order, so that any two elements
and
can be compared. In code examples, this will be done with a
method called
in which
This version of the
operation is sometimes referred to
as a successor search. It differs in a fundamental way from
since it returns a meaningful result even when there is
no element in the set that is equal to
.
The distinction between the
and
operations is very
important and is very often missed. The extra functionality provided
by an
usually comes with a price that includes both a larger
running time and a higher implementation complexity. For example, most
of the
implementations discussed in this book all have
operations with running times that are logarithmic in the size of the set.
On the other hand, the implementation of a
as a
in Chapter 5 has a
operation that runs in constant
expected time. When choosing which of these structures to use, one should
always use a
unless the extra functionality offered by an
is really needed.
opendatastructures.org