In this section we present two algorithms for exploring a graph,
starting at one of its vertices,
, and finding all vertices that
are reachable from
. Both of these algorithms are best suited to
graphs represented using an adjacency list representation. Therefore,
when analyzing these algorithms we will assume that the underlying
representation is an AdjacencyLists.
The bread-first-search algorithm starts at a vertex
and visits,
first the neighbours of
, then the neighbours of the neighbours of
,
then the neighbours of the neighbours of the neighbours of
, and so on.
This algorithm is a generalization of the breadth-first traversal
algorithm for binary trees (Section 6.1.2), and is
very similar; it uses a queue,
, that initially contains only
.
It then repeatedly extracts an element from
and adds its neighbours
to
, provided that these neighbours have never been in
before.
The only major difference between the breadth-first-search algorithm
for graphs and the one for trees is that the algorithm for graphs has
to ensure that it does not add the same vertex to
more than once.
It does this by using an auxiliary boolean array,
, that tracks
which vertices have already been discovered.
void bfs(Graph g, int r) { boolean[] seen = new boolean[g.nVertices()]; Queue<Integer> q = new SLList<Integer>(); q.add(r); seen[r] = true; while (!q.isEmpty()) { int i = q.remove(); for (Integer j : g.outEdges(i)) { if (!seen[j]) { q.add(j); seen[j] = true; } } } }An example of running
![]() |
Analyzing the running-time of the
routine is fairly
straightforward. The use of the
array ensures that no vertex is
added to
more than once. Adding (and later removing) each vertex
from
takes constant time per vertex for a total of
time.
Since each vertex is processed by the inner loop at most once, each
adjacency list is processed at most once, so each edge of
is processed
at most once. This processing, which is done in the inner loop takes
constant time per iteration, for a total of
time. Therefore,
the entire algorithm runs in
time.
The following theorem summarizes the performance of the
algorithm.
A breadth-first traversal has some very special properties. Calling
will eventually enqueue (and eventually dequeue) every vertex
such that there is a directed path from
to
. Moreover,
the vertices at distance 0 from
(
itself) will enter
before
the vertices at distance 1, which will enter
before the vertices at
distance 2, and so on. Thus, the
method visits vertices
in increasing order of distance from
and vertices that cannot be
reached from
are never visited at all.
A particularly useful application of the breadth-first-search algorithm
is, therefore, in computing shortest paths. To compute the shortest
path from
to every other vertex, we use a variant of
that uses an auxilliary array,
, of length
. When a new vertex
is added to
, we set
. In this way,
becomes the
second last node on a shortest path from
to
. Repeating this,
by taking
,
, and so on we can reconstruct the
(reversal of) a shortest path from
to
.
The depth-first-search algorithm is similar to the standard algorithm for traversing binary trees; it first fully explores one subtree before returning to the current node and then exploring the other subtree. Another way to think of depth-first-search is by saying that it is similar to breadth-first search except that it uses a stack instead of a queue.
During the execution of the depth-first-search algorithm, each vertex,
, is assigned a colour,
:
if we have never seen
the vertex before,
if we are currently visiting that vertex,
and
if we are done visiting that vertex. The easiest way to
think of depth-first-search is as a recursive algorithm. It starts by
visiting
. When visiting a vertex
, we first mark
as
.
Next, we scan
's adjacency list and recursively visit any white vertex
we find in this list. Finally, we are done processing
, so we colour
black and return.
void dfs(Graph g, int r) { byte[] c = new byte[g.nVertices()]; dfs(g, r, c); } void dfs(Graph g, int i, byte[] c) { c[i] = grey; // currently visiting i for (Integer j : g.outEdges(i)) { if (c[j] == white) { c[j] = grey; dfs(g, j, c); } } c[i] = black; // done visiting i }An example of the execution of this algorithm is shown in Figure 12.5.
![]() |
Although depth-first-search may best be thought of as a recursive
algorithm, recursion is not the best way to implement it. Indeed, the code
given above will fail for many large graphs by causing a stack overflow.
An alternative implementation is to replace the recursion stack with an
explicit stack,
. The following implementation does just that:
void dfs2(Graph g, int r) { byte[] c = new byte[g.nVertices()]; Stack<Integer> s = new Stack<Integer>(); s.push(r); while (!s.isEmpty()) { int i = s.pop(); if (c[i] == white) { c[i] = grey; for (int j : g.outEdges(i)) s.push(j); } } }In the preceding code, when the next vertex,
Not surprisingly, the running times of
and
are the
same as that of
:
As with the breadth-first-search algorithm, there is an underlying
tree associated with each execution of depth-first-search. When a node
goes from
to
, this is because
was called recursively while processing some node
. (In the case
of
algorithm,
is one of the nodes that replaced
on the stack.) If we think of
as the parent of
, then we obtain
a tree rooted at
. In Figure 12.5, this tree is a path from
vertex 0 to vertex 11.
An important property of the depth-first-search algorithm is the
following: Suppose that when node
is coloured
, there exists a path
from
to some other node
that uses only white vertices. Then
will be coloured first
then
before
is coloured
.
(This can be proven by contradiction, by considering any path
from
to
.)
One application of this property is the detection of cycles.
Refer
to Figure 12.6. Consider some cycle, , that can be reached
from
. Let
be the first node of
that is coloured
,
and let
be the node that precedes
on the cycle
. Then,
by the above property,
will be coloured
and the edge
will be considered by the algorithm while
is still
. Thus,
the algorithm can conclude that there is a path,
, from
to
in the depth-first-search tree and the edge
exists. Therefore,
is also a cycle.
![]() |
opendatastructures.org